More Insights

Who Is the Smart Grid Technology Leader?

One of the hot technology trends over the past many months has been development of the smart grid (SG).  Reading Smart Grid News and other industry, and even mainstream, publications re...

Blog | Ruth Fisher | 22-May-2010

Read more...

Playing the Net Neutrality Game, Part 2

Brief Recap of Part 1 Understanding Deep Packet Inspection Understanding Broadband Services Using DPI to Manage Internet Traffic Outcome of the Net Neutrality Game — Take 2   Brief Recap of Part 1 In Playing the Net ...

Blog | Ruth Fisher | 29-Apr-2010

Read more...

A Note on My Previous Net Neutrality Blog Post

I recently published a blog entry on the Net Neutrality Game.  However, I just found out that there is a critical aspect of the net neutrality issue that I failed ...

Blog | Ruth Fisher | 20-Apr-2010

Read more...

Playing the Net Neutrality Game, Part 1

Definition of Net Neutrality The Heart of the Matter Overview of the Net Neutrality Game Outcome of the Game: Per-User vs. Per-Usage Internet Fees   A recent court decision struck a blow against net neutrality.  ...

Blog | Ruth Fisher | 12-Apr-2010

Read more...

Is Apple's Ecosystem Successful Because of or In Spite of Apple?

Does Apple Dominate the MP3 Player & Smartphone Markets? Apple iPod & iPhone Sales Timeline How Did Apple Manage the Growth of Its Ecosystem to Create Value? Would Even More Value Have Been Cr...

Blog | Ruth Fisher | 02-Apr-2010

Read more...

Are Device – Content Systems Moving Towards Compatibility or Incompatibility?

Public vs. Private Information on the Internet Does Hardware Drive Software, or Vice Versa? Why Have Past Consortia for Compatibility Failed, and Why Would DECE Now Succeed? So Are Device-Content Systems Moving Toward ...

Blog | Ruth Fisher | 13-Mar-2010

Read more...

Creating Capital Markets for Patents

Myhrvold’s Business Model Historical Trends in Industry Funding for R&D and Patenting Will Myhrvold’s Model Work?   In recent articles in both the NYT and the Harvard Business Review, Nathan Myhrvold, former CTO of ...

Blog | Ruth Fisher | 06-Mar-2010

Read more...

Playing the e-Book Game

The e-Book Pricing Battle The following is a brief history of the e-book pricing battle that has been taking place. The passage quotes heavily from three articles: “Publishers, Amazon in Flux in ...

Blog | Ruth Fisher | 13-Feb-2010

Read more...

If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time -- a tremendous whack.

-- Winston Churchill

All Insights The EPA Values Your Life 15 Times More Than the Markets Do - Page 2
The EPA Values Your Life 15 Times More Than the Markets Do - Page 2 PDF Print E-mail
Article Index
The EPA Values Your Life 15 Times More Than the Markets Do
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
All Pages

Methodologies for Estimating the Value of Life

How is the value of a human life calculated? There are several different ways of calculating the value of a life, based on market approaches, legal approaches, compensation for accidental death, and methods used by the government for medical and environmental policy purposes.

Estimates of the value of a life under alternative approaches are summarized in the following table, with details on how the estimates were derived described in the sections below.

val_life_table_final

 

1. Market Approach: Asset Valuation

A market approach to valuing a life might consider a person as being like any other asset, in particular, a kind of intellectual “property”, so to speak. There are three primary means for determining the value of intellectual property (IP). The first is the Cost Approach, which considers the value of IP as the cost it would take to reproduce the asset, that is, build it from scratch. The, second approach to valuing IP is the Market Approach, which looks at similar types of IP that have recently been bought or sold in the marketplace, and assigns a value to the IP based on these similar transaction prices. The third approach to valuing IP is the Income Approach, which assesses the value of IP as the present value of future benefits to be derived from the IP.

Clearly, the Cost Approach and the Market Approach are not relevant here. However, we could consider the Income Approach and assign a value to a person based in the present value of his future income. So what does the average American make? Here are the data from the US Census.

ave_inc_2

What the data show are that there are big differences in income depending on your age group, that is, people have different incomes at different stages in life. The data also show that the mean values are larger than the median values, which means that income is skewed, that is, there are some people in every age group with much larger incomes than the rest of their cohort. Taken together, these data suggest that the value of a life, or, more accurately, the value of the loss of a life, using the income approach will depend on (1) how old the person is and (2) how much income he has.

Using these income numbers, I calculated the income “value”, assuming a person lives to be 75 and using a 3% discount rate, in 4 ways (1) assuming the individual has the typical 2008 US median income, $26,513, for his whole life; (2) assuming the individual has the typical respective 2008 US median incomes at his different stages of life (e.g., $9,862 when he’s 15 to 24 years old, $30,182 when he’s 25 to 34 years old, $35,767 when he’s 35 to 44 years old, etc.; (3) assuming the individual has the typical 2008 US mean income, $38,376, for his whole life; (2) assuming the individual has the typical respective 2008 US mean incomes at his different stages of life. These results are presented in rows [1] through [4] in the summary table above.



 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh