Winning the Hardware Software Game Winning the Hardware-Software Game - 2nd Edition

Using Game Theory to Optimize the Pace of New Technology Adoption
  • How do you encourage speedier adoption of your product or service?
  • How do you increase the value your product or service creates for your customers?
  • How do you extract more of the value created by your product or service for yourself?

Read more...

Latest Comments

  • Anonymous said More
    Great explanation for the relationship... 4 days ago.
  • Anonymous said More
    nice analysis, thanks Wednesday, 21 October 2020
  • Anonymous said More
    The fact that CBD from marijuana is... Sunday, 14 June 2020
  • Anonymous said More
    This was excellent and extremely... Tuesday, 21 April 2020
  • Anonymous said More
    Well written. Well constructed. Tuesday, 13 August 2019

A copy of the full analysis can be downloaded by clicking on the link at the bottom of this blog entry.

 

In Part 1 of this analysis, I described the main issues facing Doctors: (i) decreasing reimbursements, (ii) divergent reimbursements by location, (iii) transition from fee-for-service to pay-for-performance, (iv) increasing costs, and (v) increasing regulations.

In this part of the analysis, Part 2, I describe the main isssues facing Patients and Payers.

In the last part of the analysis, Part 3, I will discuss the tensions (conflicts) between the different sets of players that are engendered by the different incentives each player faces.

Patients

In a previous analysis, “Why Are Healthcare Costs So High?” I found that

•  US healthcare expenditures have been increasing over time;

•  There seems to be a shift during the 1980s, in which annual personal expenditures on healthcare started increasing at a faster rate;

•  Healthcare expenditures for treating the top 20 medical conditions account for 75% of expenditures;

•  The increases in spending for the top 20 diseases are due mostly to increases in the number of people being treated for (chronic) diseases, rather than to increases in per-patient costs of treatment;

•  Healthcare expenditures are concentrated, where the Top 5% of Users account for over half of total healthcare expenditures;

•  The Bottom 95% of the population is paying roughly twice as much for healthcare services than they actually use, where the difference is going to subsidize the Top 5% of healthcare users, and the Bottom 70% of the population is paying seven times as much as they use, where the difference is going to subsidize the Top 30% of healthcare users;

•  The high-cost healthcare users are people with multiple, chronic conditions, including coronary artery disease, diabetes, congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;

•  At least seven of the top ten medical conditions that account for the majority of healthcare spending can be at least partially prevented and/or mitigated by factors under the control of individuals, namely, weight control, eating habits, drinking (alcohol) habits, activity levels, and smoking status.

I assume that patients act to maximize their well-being. Patients’ well-being is determined by a variety of factors, some of which are under patients’ control and others of which are not. These factors can generally be divided into four categories (which are overlapping in their respective impacts on well-being), which I call: (i) lifestyle, (ii) environment, (iii) state of mind, and (iv) healthcare costs.

Many patients face a tension when trying to optimize their well-being: while patients enjoy being healthy, many people also enjoy engaging in “unhealthy” lifestyles. I believe that it is this health vs. lifestyle tradeoff lies at the heart of society’s healthcare spending problem.

 

Lifestyle

What I call lifestyle factors are factors that (a) patients control, (b) affect their enjoyment of life, (c) and affect their health. These include

•  Diet: Do patients generally maintain a healthy diet?

•  Exercise: Do patients generally get enough exercise?

•  Alcohol: Do patients drink a lot of alcohol?

•  Smoking Status: Do patients smoke?

•  Risky Behavior: Do patients engage in high-risk activities?

Based upon the findings in my previous analysis (“Why Are Healthcare Costs So High?”) that many more people are being treated over time for chronic conditions that are caused by unhealthy lifestyles, I conclude that people generally are happier when they choose lifestyles that are less healthy.

 

Environment

What I call environmental factors are factors that (a) patients do not control, (b) affect their enjoyment of life, (c) and affect their health. These include

•  Genetic Factors: Are patients predisposed toward bad health?

•  Culture/Neighborhood: Do patients’ cultures or neighborhoods support “healthy” behaviors?

•  Influence Group: Do patients have family or peer groups that influence their attitudes and behavior? Do these groups encourage them to engage in “healthy” behaviors?

Culture and peer groups are factors that are largely outside of peoples’ control and have large impacts behavior and lifestyle. Even if people would like to adopt healthier lifestyles, it will be much more difficult for them to succeed to the extent that those behaviors conflict with their cultures and/or peer attitudes.

 

State of Mind

The last category of factors that affects patients’ health and well-being, which is (largely) under the patients’ control, is what I call state of mind. This category encompasses

•  Literacy: Does the patient know what constitutes a healthy lifestyle (e.g., does he understanding nutrition basics) and how to adhere to physicians’ recommendations (e.g., is he able to read and understanding proper medication dosing regimens)?

•  Acceptance: Does the patient accept his condition, or is he in a state of denial?

•  Willingness to Participate: Is the patient willing to take responsibility and participate in his own well-being?

Studies have shown that one of the most important factors in contributing to a patient’s positive state of mind is the patient’s relationship with his doctor. The more trust a person has in his doctor, and the better he feels he is able to communicate and be understood by his doctor (i.e, the greater is the patient-doctor concordance), the more likely he is to actively participate in his own care and to adhere to his doctor’s recommendations (see, for example, Leslie R Martin, Summer L Williams, Kelly B Haskard, M Robin DiMatteo, “The Challenge of Patient Adherence”).

 

Healthcare Costs

People’s well-being is enhanced when they pay as little as possible for their healthcare. People affect the costs they end up paying for their healthcare by choosing

•  Whether or not to buy healthcare insurance,

•  The type of healthcare insurance plan to buy (e.g., high deductibles vs. high premiums), and

•  Their lifestyle and state of mind.

 

Insurance Companies (Payers)

Healthcare insurance operates by having people who use fewer healthcare services cross-subsidize people who use more healthcare services.  Healthcare insurance costs for low intensity healthcare users will thus be higher when

•  There are more people who are high intensity healthcare users and/or

•  The intensity of use among high intensity healthcare users is greater.

The ACA also increased the amount of cross-subsidization of healthcare services by making wealthier people pay a larger portion of the healthcare costs incurred by poorer people.

Insurance companies seek to maximize profits, which is the difference between (i) insurance premiums collected from customers and (ii) payouts for healthcare services made to customers and providers. Insurance companies choose reimbursement levels they provide to physicians and insurance premiums they charge from patients to maximize these profits.

The insurance companies choose their reimbursements and premium levels at the beginning of the year based on the amount of services they expect patients to consume during the year. If payouts end up being greater than expected, insurance companies will end up generating lower-than-expected profits, and conversely, if payouts end up being less than expected, insurance companies will end up generating higher-than-expected profits. Assuming a relatively competitive system, over time, the higher profit years and lower profit years will generally balance each other out.

Under the ARRA/ACA, however, insurance companies are now constrained in the amount of profits they can generate in any given year. What this means is that if by the end of the year insurance companies end up paying out less for healthcare services than they had anticipated, they are required to refund a portion of the premiums paid by patients.

Under the ARRA/ACA, Payers (insurance companies, Medicare, Medicaid) are also changing the way they reimburse physicians. Specifically, payers are transitioning from a fee-for-service system to a pay-for-performance system. This transition was described above in the section on Physicians.

 

Go to: Playing the Doctor-Patient-Insurance Company Game, Part 3

More Blogs

Cannabis Cultivation: Seeds vs. Clones

26-09-2020 - Hits:1763 - Ruth Fisher - avatar Ruth Fisher

Cannabis plants are dioecious, that is, they are either male or female. Plant reproduction occurs naturally, when male plants pollinate female plants, causing female plants to produce seeds. New cannabis plants can thus be cultivated by collecting seeds from fertilized females and replanting them, or by buying seeds generated by...

Read more

Cannabis Cultivation: Indoor vs. Outdoor vs. Greenhouse

22-09-2020 - Hits:1448 - Ruth Fisher - avatar Ruth Fisher

There are three basic locales for growing cannabis: indoors, outdoors, or in greenhouses. Greenhouses enable growers to benefit from natural light, while also being able to strategically block out light to induce quicker flowering. Budget-friendly greenhouse operations are more subject natural climate variations, while higher-end greenhouses are more similar to...

Read more

Would the Endocannabinoid System Have Been Discovered Earlier without the Ban on…

10-06-2020 - Hits:1588 - Ruth Fisher - avatar Ruth Fisher

Cannabis was used medicinally in the Western world from the mid-1800s through 1940, even though doctors did not understand cannabis’s mechanisms of action. The Marijuana Tax At of 1937 Federally banned the use of cannabis in the US for either medical or recreational uses, and it restricted scientific studies of...

Read more

How Regulations Shape the Cannabis Industry

16-05-2020 - Hits:2367 - Ruth Fisher - avatar Ruth Fisher

  The cannabis industry is highly regulated, and the various regulations play a powerful role in shaping the structure, and thus outcome, of the industry. This analysis examines the following questions: How do cannabis market regulations shape market structure? Are the resulting outcomes favorable to suppliers and/or consumers? What are the pros and cons...

Read more

Cannabis Industry Rollouts: Lessons Learned from States’ Experiences

27-04-2020 - Hits:1754 - Ruth Fisher - avatar Ruth Fisher

Bart Schaneman from MJ Business Daily recently released, “2020 Cultivation Snapshot: U.S. Wholesale Marijuana Prices & Supply.” The information contained in the report helped cement certain insights I’ve had about the evolution of the cannabis market. Background info In addition to the myriad other laws and regulations, all states essentially have two...

Read more

A Data-Generating System: A Framework for Data Assessment

14-04-2020 - Hits:1069 - Ruth Fisher - avatar Ruth Fisher

Suppose I gave you, the Data Analyst, a dataset of information on sales of Ford automobiles, and suppose I told you to use that dataset to predict total national sales of Ford automobiles for next 12 months. What would you want to know about the data you were given? If you...

Read more

Hemp and CBD Market Supply

06-04-2020 - Hits:1890 - Ruth Fisher - avatar Ruth Fisher

The information in this post was compiled in an attempt to understand 2 issues: Does the cultivation of hemp differ depending on the hemp product supplied (fiber, seed, or flower)? Is the CBD produced from hemp (cannabis with ≤ 0.3% THC) identical to the CBD produced from marijuana (cannabis with > 0.3%...

Read more

Trends in Cannabis Patents Over Time

08-12-2019 - Hits:2353 - Ruth Fisher - avatar Ruth Fisher

Patent Counts by Year I searched the USPTO patent database for all patents for which the patent abstract contained any of the following terms: cannabis, cannabinoid, marijuana, tetrahydrocannabinoid, or cannabinol. My search yielded 914 patents. As seen in Figure 1, there were only a handful of cannabis patents each year until the...

Read more